Repository logo
 

Cereals, calories and change: exploring approaches to quantification in Indus archaeobotany

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Abstract

Several major cereal groups have been identified as staples used by the pre-urban, urban and post-urban phase populations of the Indus Civilisation (3200–1500 BCE): wheat, barley, a range of small hulled millets and also rice, though their proportional exploitation is variable across space and over time. Traditional quantification methods examine the frequency, intensity and proportionality of the use of these crops and help ascertain the ‘relative importance’ of these cereals for Indus populations. However, this notion of ‘importance’ is abstracted from the daily lives of the people using these crops and may be biased by the differential production (as well as archaeological survival) of individual cereals. This paper outlines an alternative approach to quantifying Indus cereals by investigating proportions of calories. Cereals are predominantly composed of carbohydrates and therefore provided much of the daily caloric intake among many late Holocene farming populations. The four major cereal groups cultivated by Indus farmers, however, vary greatly in terms of calories per grain, and this has an impact on their proportional input to past diets. This paper demonstrates that, when converted to proportions of calories, the perceived ‘importance’ of cereals from five Indus sites changes dramatically, reducing the role of the previously dominant small hulled millet species and elevating the role of Triticoid grains. Although other factors will also have affected how a farmer perceived the role and importance of a crop, including its ecological tolerances, investments required to grow it, and the crop’s role in the economy, this papers suggests that some consideration of what cereals meant in terms of daily lives is needed alongside the more abstracted quantification methods that have traditionally been applied.

Description

Journal Title

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1866-9557
1866-9565

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
European Research Council (648609)
This research was carried out as a part of JB’s PhD research, which was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council. Analysis was carried out in the George Pitt Rivers laboratory in the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge. Samples were provided by the Land, Water, Settlement project, co-directed by CAP and RNS, which is a collaboration between the University of Cambridge and Banaras Hindu University that was carried out with the support of the Archaeological Survey of India. The Land, Water, Settlement project was funded by the UK India Education Research Initiative, British Academy Stein Arnold Fund, Isaac Newton Trust, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research and the Research Councils UK. Additional fieldwork funding for JB was provided by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, Rouse-Ball Research Fund, Cambridge India Partnership Fund, Division of Archaeology Fieldwork Fund and Trinity College Projects Fund.