Predicting out-of-office blood pressure level using repeated measurements in the clinic: an observational cohort study.
Sheppard, James P
Hobbs, FD Richard
McManus, Richard J
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
MetadataShow full item record
Sheppard, J. P., Holder, R., Nichols, L., Bray, E., Hobbs, F. R., Mant, J., Little, P., et al. (2014). Predicting out-of-office blood pressure level using repeated measurements in the clinic: an observational cohort study.. J Hypertens, 32 (11), 2171-2178. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000319
OBJECTIVES: Identification of people with lower (white-coat effect) or higher (masked effect) blood pressure at home compared to the clinic usually requires ambulatory or home monitoring. This study assessed whether changes in SBP with repeated measurement at a single clinic predict subsequent differences between clinic and home measurements. METHODS: This study used an observational cohort design and included 220 individuals aged 35-84 years, receiving treatment for hypertension, but whose SBP was not controlled. The characteristics of change in SBP over six clinic readings were defined as the SBP drop, the slope and the quadratic coefficient using polynomial regression modelling. The predictive abilities of these characteristics for lower or higher home SBP readings were investigated with logistic regression and repeated operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The single clinic SBP drop was predictive of the white-coat effect with a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 50%, positive predictive value of 56% and negative predictive value of 88%. Predictive values for the masked effect and those of the slope and quadratic coefficient were slightly lower, but when the slope and quadratic variables were combined, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the masked effect were improved to 91, 48, 24 and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Characteristics obtainable from multiple SBP measurements in a single clinic in patients with treated hypertension appear to reasonably predict those unlikely to have a large white-coat or masked effect, potentially allowing better targeting of out-of-office monitoring in routine clinical practice.
Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Masked Hypertension, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, White Coat Hypertension
This study presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme (RP-PG-1209–10051). R.J.Mc.M. holds an NIHR Professorship. J.S. was funded by the NIHR Birmingham and Black Country Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care during part of this work, but now holds a Medical Research Council Strategic Skills Postdoctoral Fellowship. B.W. is a NIHR Senior Investigator and is supported by the NIHR UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. The TASMINH2 trial was funded by the UK Department of Health Policy Research Programme and the National Coordinating Centre for Research Capacity Development. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, NIHR, or the Department of Health. All equipment used in the study was purchased commercially.
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000319
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/285134
Attribution 4.0 International
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: firstname.lastname@example.org