Perceptions of scientific consensus predict later beliefs about the reality of climate change using cross-lagged panel analysis: A response to Kerr and Wilson (2018)

van der Linden, Sander; Leiserowitz, A; Maibach, E

View / Open Files

Accepted version (PDF, 710Kb)

Authors

van der Linden, Sander

Leiserowitz, A

Maibach, E

Publication Date

2018-12

Journal Title

Journal of Environmental Psychology

ISSN

0272-4944

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Volume

Pages

110-111

Type

Article

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2018). Perceptions of scientific consensus predict later beliefs about the reality of climate change using cross-lagged panel analysis: A response to Kerr and Wilson (2018). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 60 110-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.10.002

Abstract

In a recent study, Kerr and Wilson (2018) claim to provide a failed test of the Gateway Belief Model (GBM) using a cross-lagged panel analysis with 356 college students. Although we applaud the authors’ effort to extend scholarly work on the GBM, we point out several mischaracterizations of our work and present evidence that contradicts their findings.

Identifiers

External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.10.002

This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/285757

Rights

Licence:

http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved

Statistics

Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the IRUS guide.