Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable
View / Open Files
Authors
Publication Date
2018-01-01Journal Title
The Journal of Philosophy
ISSN
1939-8549
Publisher
F.J.E. Woodbridge : W.T. Bush
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Heesen, R. (2018). Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable. The Journal of Philosophy https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20181151239
Abstract
Recent philosophical work has praised the reward structure of science, while recent empirical work has shown that many scientific results may not be reproducible. I argue that the reward structure of science incentivizes scientists to focus on speed and impact at the expense of the reproducibility of their work, thus contributing to the so-called reproducibility crisis. I use a rational choice model to identify a set of sufficient conditions for this problem to arise, and I argue that these conditions plausibly apply to a wide range of research situations. Currently proposed solutions will not fully address this problem. Philosophical commentators should temper their optimism about the reward structure of science.
Sponsorship
This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under grant SES 1254291 and by an Early Career Fellowship from the Leverhulme Trust and the Isaac Newton Trust.
Funder references
Isaac Newton Trust (1608(ac))
Leverhulme Trust (ECF-2016-551)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20181151239
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/288025
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Licence URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.