Evaluating regulatory strategies for mitigating hydrological risk in Brazil through diversification of its electricity mix
View / Open Files
Authors
Paim, MA
Dalmarco, AR
Yang, CH
Lindner, S
de Andrade Guerra, JBSO
Derani, C
Bruce da Silva, T
Viñuales, JE
Publication Date
2019Journal Title
Energy Policy
ISSN
0301-4215
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
128
Pages
393-401
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Paim, M., Dalmarco, A., Yang, C., Salas, P., Lindner, S., Mercure, J., de Andrade Guerra, J., et al. (2019). Evaluating regulatory strategies for mitigating hydrological risk in Brazil through diversification of its electricity mix. Energy Policy, 128 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.064
Abstract
Hydroelectricity provides approximately 65% of Brazil’s power generating capacity, making the country vulnerable to droughts, which are becoming increasingly frequent. Current energy law and policy responses to the problem rely on a sectorial approach and prioritise energy security and market regulation. Brazil has opted to increase energy security levels during periods of hydrological variability with national grid interconnection and thermal plants backup. Additionally, Brazil has created the Energy Reallocation Mechanism (MRE) to manage the generators’ financial impacts in times of insufficient water. This policy, however, was unable to avoid the high financial exposure of generators in the spot market during the severe droughts experienced in the period 2013-2017. To explore how a more diversified electricity matrix can contribute to reducing hydrological risk, this article uses Integrated Assessment Modelling (IAM) techniques to analyse future macroeconomic and energy scenarios for Brazil in a global context, aligned with the Brazilian Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) under the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change. We show that the addition of non-hydro renewables is an advantage from the integrated Water-Energy-Food nexus perspective because it reduces trade-offs amongst the water and energy sectors. Our conclusions suggest that a nexus perspective can provide useful insights on how to design energy laws and policies.
Sponsorship
Philomathia Foundation; Cambridge Humanities Research Grants
Funder references
Newton Fund (via EPSRC) (unknown)
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N013174/1)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K007254/1)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N002504/1)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.064
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/288659
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.