To freeze or not to freeze: A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit
View / Open Files
Authors
Anderson, RJ
van der Zee, Sophie
Poppe, Ronald
Taylor, Paul J
Publication Date
2019Journal Title
PLoS ONE
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
14
Issue
4
Number
e0215000
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Anderson, R., van der Zee, S., Poppe, R., & Taylor, P. J. (2019). To freeze or not to freeze: A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit. PLoS ONE, 14 (4. e0215000) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215000
Abstract
We present a new signal for detecting deception: full body motion. Previous work on detecting deception from body movement has relied either on human judges or on specific gestures (such as fidgeting or gaze aversion) that are coded by humans. While this research has helped to build the foundation of the field, results are often characterized by inconsistent and contradictory findings, with small-stakes lies under lab conditions detected at rates little better than guessing. We examine whether a full body motion capture suit, which records the position, velocity, and orientation of 23 points in the subject’s body, could yield a better signal of deception. Interviewees of South Asian (n = 60) or White British culture (n = 30) were required to either tell the truth or lie about two experienced tasks while being interviewed by somebody from their own (n = 60) or different culture (n = 30). We discovered that full body motion–the sum of joint displacements–was indicative of lying 74.4% of the time. Further analyses indicated that including individual limb data in our full body motion measurements can increase its discriminatory power to 82.2%. Furthermore, movement was guilt- and penitential-related, and occurred independently of anxiety, cognitive load, and cultural background. It appears that full body motion can be an objective nonverbal indicator of deceit, showing that lying does not cause people to freeze.
Sponsorship
The research presented in this paper was part funded by the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats, website: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/. Funding source: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Award: ES/N009614/1 and EPSRC grant EP/K033476/1 by Ross Anderson.
Funder references
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K033476/1)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215000
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/291859
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk