Repository logo
 

Obstacles to Studying Alternative Splicing Using scRNA-seq

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Ferguson-Smith, Anne  ORCID logo  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4996-9990
Westoby, Jennifer 
Artemov, Pavel 
Hemberg, Martin 

Abstract

Abstract Background: Early single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) studies suggested that it was unusual to see more than one isoform being produced from a gene in a single cell, even when multiple isoforms were detected in matched bulk RNA-seq samples. However, these studies generally did not consider the impact of dropouts or isoform quanti cation errors, potentially confounding the results of these analyses.

Results: In this study, we take a simulation based approach in which we explicitly account for dropouts and isoform quanti cation errors. We use our simulations to ask to what extent it is possible to study alternative splicing using scRNA-seq. Additionally, we ask what limitations must be overcome to make splicing analysis feasible. We nd that the high rate of dropouts associated with scRNA-seq is a major obstacle to studying alternative splicing. In mice and other well established model organisms, the relatively low rate of isoform quanti cation errors poses a lesser obstacle to splicing analysis. We find that different models of isoform choice meaningfully change our simulation results.

Conclusions: To accurately study alternative splicing with single-cell RNA-seq, a better understanding of isoform choice and the errors associated with scRNA-seq is required. An increase in the capture e ciency of scRNA-seq would also be beneficial. Until some or all of the above are achieved, we do not recommend attempting to resolve isoforms in individual cells using scRNA-seq.

Description

Keywords

Journal Title

Genome Biology

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1474-7596
1474-760X

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Nature
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (MR/R009791/1)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (1804962)
JW was supported by a BBSRC DTP studentship BB/M011194/1. MH was funded by a core grant from the Wellcome Trust. AFS was funded by the Medical Research Council, MR/R009791/1.