General intelligence: an ecumenical heuristic for artificial consciousness research?
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
MetadataShow full item record
Shevlin, H. General intelligence: an ecumenical heuristic for artificial consciousness research?. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.52059
ABSTRACT: The science of consciousness has made great strides in recent decades. However, the proliferation of competing theories makes it difficult to reach consensus about artificial consciousness. While for purely scientific purposes we might wish to adopt a ‘wait and see’ attitude, we may soon face practical and ethical questions about whether, for example, an artificial agents is capable of suffering. Moreover, many of the methods used for assessing consciousness in humans and even non-human animals are not straightforwardly applicable to artificial systems. With these challenges in mind, I propose that we look for ecumenical heuristics for artificial consciousness to enable us to make tentative assessments of the likelihood of consciousness arising in different artificial systems. I argue that such heuristics should have three main features: they should be intuitively plausible, theoretically neutral, and scientifically tractable. I claim that the concept of general intelligence – understood as a capacity for robust, flexible, and integrated cognition and behavior – satisfies these criteria and may thus provide the basis for such a heuristic, allowing us to make initial cautious estimations of which artificial systems are most likely to be conscious.
This work was supported by the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, Leverhulme Trust, under Grant RC-2015-067.
Embargo Lift Date
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.52059
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/304978
All rights reserved
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: firstname.lastname@example.org