Six attachment discourses: convergence, divergence and relay.
Mannes, Julia MM
Skinner, Guy CM
Attachment & human development
MetadataShow full item record
Duschinsky, R., Bakkum, L., Mannes, J. M., Skinner, G. C., Turner, M., Mann, A., Coughlan, B., et al. (2021). Six attachment discourses: convergence, divergence and relay.. Attachment & human development, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2021.1918448
Attachment concepts are used in diverging ways, often without recognition of this divergence. This has caused confusion in communication among researchers, among practitioners, and between researchers and practitioners, and hinders their potential for collaboration. Responding to this problem, in this essay we explore how attachment concepts may vary in meaning across six different domains: popular discourses, developmental science, social psychological science, psychiatric diagnosis, psychotherapy, and child welfare practice. We attempt to typify these forms of attachment discourse by highlighting points of convergence, divergence, and relay between the different domains. Our general conclusions are that diversity in the use of attachment concepts across different domains of application has been largely unrecognised, and that recognition of these differences would reduce confusion, help identify sites where infrastructure needs to be developed to support coordination, and strengthen opportunities for collaboration to mutual benefit. Further, we suggest that academic attachment discourse would benefit from clarification of terminology in the following areas: “attachment”, “minimising” and “maximising” of attachment, “internal working model”, “states of mind regarding attachment”, “trauma”, and “dysregulation”.
Wellcome Trust WT103343MA NIHR School of Primary Care Research 392 and RG945777
Embargo Lift Date
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2021.1918448
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/322011
All rights reserved