Life cycle assessment of recycling strategies for perovskite photovoltaic modules
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2021-09Journal Title
Nature Sustainability
ISSN
2398-9629
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
821-829
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Tian, X., Stranks, S., & You, F. (2021). Life cycle assessment of recycling strategies for perovskite photovoltaic modules. Nature Sustainability, 4 (9), 821-829. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z
Abstract
Effectively recycling spent perovskite solar modules will further reduce the energy inputs and environmental consequences induced by their production and deployment, thus facilitating their sustainable development. Here, through “cradle-to-grave” life cycle assessments on a variety of perovskite solar cell architectures, we report that the substrates with conducting oxide and energy-intensive heating processes are the largest contributors to the primary energy consumption, global warming potential, and other impact categories. We thus focus on these materials and processes when expanding to “cradle-to-cradle” analyses with recycling as the end-of-life scenario. Our results reveal that recycling strategies can lead to up to 72.6% shorter energy payback time and 71.2% reduction in greenhouse gas emission factor. We highlight that the best recycled module architecture can exhibit an extremely small energy payback time of 0.09 years and greenhouse gas emission factor as low as 13.4 g CO2-eq/kWh, such that it outcompetes all other rivals including the market-leading silicon at 1.3 - 2.4 years and 22.1 - 38.1 g CO2-eq/kWh. Finally, we use sensitivity analyses to highlight the importance of prolonging the device lifetime and quantify the impacts of uncertainty induced by the still immature manufacturing processes, changing operating conditions, and individual differences for each module.
Sponsorship
This work is supported in part by National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Award (CBET-1643244). S.D.S. acknowledges support from the Royal Society and Tata Group (UF150033).
Funder references
Royal Society (UF150033)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/324309
Rights
All rights reserved
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.