A comparison of transhepatic versus transperitoneal cholecystostomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 5-year experience.
O'Neill, J Robert
Journal of surgical case reports
MetadataShow full item record
Bennett, S., Shaida, N., Godfrey, E., Safranek, P., & O'Neill, J. R. (2021). A comparison of transhepatic versus transperitoneal cholecystostomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 5-year experience.. [Other]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjab410
Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis used in patients where surgery is high risk or challenging either to allow for surgical optimisation or as definitive treatment. In this case series we compare the outcomes of a transhepatic versus transperitoneal approach in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. A retrospective review of patients from 2014 to 2019 was conducted and included demographics, percutaneous cholecystostomy route, complications and outcome. Fifty-one patients were included. Percutaneous cholecystostomy was placed transhepatically in 15 cases; transperitoneal in 30 cases; 6 cases had undetermined route. The transhepatic cohort had 43.5% fewer readmissions due to biliary sepsis, 32.5% fewer drain-related complications, and were less likely to require further treatment (32.5% reduction) compared to the transperitoneal cohort. In our experience, the transhepatic route is preferred due to fewer complications, fewer readmissions and a reduction in the need for further treatment.
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjab410
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.77050
Attribution 4.0 International
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/