How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience.
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2021-10-26Journal Title
BMC Public Health
ISSN
1471-2458
Publisher
BioMed Central
Volume
21
Issue
1
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ng, S. W., Colchero, M. A., & White, M. (2021). How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience.. BMC Public Health, 21 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11984-2
Description
Funder: Bloomberg Philanthropies
Funder: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Funder: Laura and John Arnold Foundation
Funder: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Funder: Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica
Abstract
Over 45 jurisdictions globally have implemented sweetened beverage taxes. Researchers and policymakers need to assess whether and how these taxes change beverage demand and supply, their intended and unanticipated health, economic and equity impacts. Lessons from such evaluations can maximise the policies' success and impact on non-communicable disease prevention globally. We discuss key theoretical, design and methodological considerations to help policymakers, funders and researchers commission and conduct rigorous evaluations of these policies and related disease prevention efforts. We encourage involving the perspectives of various stakeholders on what evaluations are needed given the specific context, what data and methods are appropriate, readily available or can be collected within time and budget constraints. A logic model /conceptual system map of anticipated implications across sectors and scales should help identify optimal study design, analytical techniques and measures. These models should be updated when synthesising findings across diverse methods and integrating findings across subpopulations using similar methods.
Keywords
Evaluation, Logic models, Policy, Sugar-sweetened beverage, Tax, Beverages, Humans, Noncommunicable Diseases, Public Policy, Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Taxes
Sponsorship
Wellcome Trust (087636/Z/08/Z)
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/6)
Medical Research Council (MR/K023187/1)
MRC (MC_UU_00006/7)
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007462/1)
Department of Health (via National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)) (16/130/01)
Identifiers
PMC8546197, 34702248
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11984-2
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332169
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk