Splicing predictions, minigene analyses, and ACMG-AMP clinical classification of 42 germline PALB2 splice-site variants.
Authors
Valenzuela-Palomo, Alberto
Bueno-Martínez, Elena
Sanoguera-Miralles, Lara
Lorca, Víctor
Fraile-Bethencourt, Eugenia
Esteban-Sánchez, Ada
Gómez-Barrero, Susana
Carvalho, Sara
Allen, Jamie
García-Álvarez, Alicia
Pérez-Segura, Pedro
Dorling, Leila
Easton, Douglas F
Devilee, Peter
Vreeswijk, Maaike Pg
Publication Date
2022-03Journal Title
J Pathol
ISSN
0022-3417
Publisher
Wiley
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
AO
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Valenzuela-Palomo, A., Bueno-Martínez, E., Sanoguera-Miralles, L., Lorca, V., Fraile-Bethencourt, E., Esteban-Sánchez, A., Gómez-Barrero, S., et al. (2022). Splicing predictions, minigene analyses, and ACMG-AMP clinical classification of 42 germline PALB2 splice-site variants.. J Pathol https://doi.org/10.1002/path.5839
Abstract
PALB2 loss-of-function variants confer high risk of developing breast cancer. Here we present a systematic functional analysis of PALB2 splice-site variants detected in approximately 113,000 women in the large-scale sequencing project Breast Cancer After Diagnostic Gene Sequencing (BRIDGES; https://bridges-research.eu/). Eighty-two PALB2 variants at the intron-exon boundaries were analyzed with MaxEntScan. Forty-two variants were selected for the subsequent splicing functional assays. For this purpose, three splicing reporter minigenes comprising exons 1-12 were constructed. The 42 potential spliceogenic variants were introduced into the minigenes by site-directed mutagenesis and assayed in MCF-7/MDA-MB-231 cells. Splicing anomalies were observed in 35 variants, 23 of which showed no traces or minimal amounts of the expected full-length transcripts of each minigene. More than 30 different variant-induced transcripts were characterized, 23 of which were predicted to truncate the PALB2 protein. The pathogenicity of all variants was interpreted according to an in-house adaptation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) variant classification scheme. Up to 23 variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Remarkably, three ±1,2 variants (c.49-2A>T, c.108+2T>C, and c.211+1G>A) were classified as variants of unknown significance, as they produced significant amounts of either in-frame transcripts of unknown impact on the PALB2 protein function or the minigene full-length transcripts. In conclusion, we have significantly contributed to the ongoing effort of identifying spliceogenic variants in the clinically relevant PALB2 cancer susceptibility gene. Moreover, we suggest some approaches to classify the findings in accordance with the ACMG-AMP rationale. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Keywords
PALB2, VUS, aberrant splicing, breast cancer, clinical interpretation, functional assay, minigene, splicing, susceptibility genes, Alternative Splicing, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Databases, Genetic, Exons, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N Protein, Female, Humans, MCF-7 Cells, Protein Isoforms, RNA Splice Sites
Sponsorship
European Commission Horizon 2020 (H2020) Societal Challenges (634935)
Identifiers
path5839
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/path.5839
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332347
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk