Repository logo
 

A whole-ecosystem method for experimentally suppressing ants on a small scale

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Type

Article

Change log

Abstract

jats:titleAbstract</jats:title>jats:p jats:list

jats:list-itemjats:pAnt suppression experiments have emerged as a powerful method for assessing the role of ants in ecosystems. However, traditional methods have been limited to canopy ants, and not assessed the role of ants on and below ground. Recent advances have enabled whole‐ecosystem ant suppression in large plots, but large‐scale experiments are not always feasible. Here, we develop a small‐scale, whole‐ecosystem suppression method. We compare techniques for monitoring suppression experiments, and assess whether habitat complexity in oil palm influences our method's effectiveness.</jats:p></jats:list-item>

jats:list-itemjats:pWe conducted ant suppression experiments in oil palm agroforestry in Sumatra, Indonesia. We used targeted poison baits, a physical barrier and canopy isolation to suppress ants in 4 m radius arenas around single palms. We sequentially tested three suppression methods that increased in intensity over 18 months. We sampled ant abundance before and after suppression by fogging, using pitfall traps and extracting soil monoliths. We also monitored ants throughout the experiment by baiting. We tested the soil for residual poison and monitored other invertebrates (Araneae, Coleoptera, Orthoptera and Chilopoda) to test for cross‐contamination. Plots were established under four oil palm management treatments that varied in their habitat complexity: reduced, intermediate and high understorey complexity treatments in mature plantation, and a recently replanted plantation.</jats:p></jats:list-item>

jats:list-itemjats:pPost‐treatment ant abundance was 92% lower in suppression than control plots. Only the most intensive suppression method, which ran for the final 9 months, worked. Baiting rarely reflected the other monitoring methods. The treatment negatively affected Orthoptera, but not other taxa. There was no residual poison in the soil. Coleoptera abundance increased in suppression plots post‐treatment, potentially due to reduced competition with ants. Our findings were consistent across management treatments.</jats:p></jats:list-item>

jats:list-itemjats:pWe developed a whole‐ecosystem method for suppressing ants on a small scale in oil palm plantations. Our method represents a significant advance; previous reductions in ant abundance have not exceeded 38%. We provide the first example of ants being experimentally suppressed belowground. Baiting alone is not adequate for assessing suppression effectiveness, and testing a range of taxa for confounding impacts is important. Our study can act as a blueprint for developing suppression methods for other taxa, which offer unique insights into community ecology.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p>

Description

Funder: Sinar Mas Agro Resources Technology Research Institute (SMARTRI)


Funder: The Isaac Newton Trust Cambridge; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004815

Keywords

competition ecology, ecological redundancy, ecological resilience, exclusion experiment, Formicidae, invasive species control, whole-ecosystem experimental manipulation, Yellow Crazy Ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes)

Journal Title

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2041-210X
2041-210X

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley
Sponsorship
Isaac Newton Trust (Minute 925(ab))
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P00458X/1)
Whitten Studentship, Department of Zoology