Practical Considerations for Continuous Time-Domain Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices in Traumatic Brain Injury: Do Scaling Errors in Parent Signals Matter?
Authors
Froese, Logan
Gomez, Alwyn
Sainbhi, Amanjyot Singh
Slack, Trevor
Zeiler, Frederick A.
Publication Date
2022-03-21Journal Title
Frontiers in Neurology
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
Volume
13
Language
en
Type
Other
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Froese, L., Gomez, A., Sainbhi, A. S., Slack, T., & Zeiler, F. A. (2022). Practical Considerations for Continuous Time-Domain Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices in Traumatic Brain Injury: Do Scaling Errors in Parent Signals Matter?. [Other]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.857617
Abstract
Literature pertaining to traumatic brain injury care involves the mediation and control of secondary brain injury mechanisms, chief among these is cerebral autoregulation. Cerebral autoregulation is frequently assessed through surrogate measures of cerebrovascular reactivity. An important aspect to acknowledge when calculating cerebrovascular reactivity indices is the linearity within two-parent bio-signals or variables. We highlighted the concept of linearity in raw parent bio-signals used for the calculation of the cerebrovascular reactivity index and what potential implications linearity carries for index derivation. Key of which is that the initial differencing or location of the pressure probes does not influence linear methods of cerebral reactivity calculations so long as the slow-wave vasogenic changes are being recorded.
Keywords
Neurology, traumatic brain injury, cerebrovascular reactivity (CVRx), cerebral autoregulation, linearity, continuous monitoring
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.857617
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.83170
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk