Centralizing and decentralizing governance in the COVID-19 pandemic: The politics of credit and blame.
View / Open Files
Authors
Rozenblum, Sarah
Falkenbach, Michelle
Löblová, Olga
Jarman, Holly
Williams, Noah
Wismar, Matthias
Publication Date
2022-05Journal Title
Health Policy
ISSN
0168-8510
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Greer, S. L., Rozenblum, S., Falkenbach, M., Löblová, O., Jarman, H., Williams, N., & Wismar, M. (2022). Centralizing and decentralizing governance in the COVID-19 pandemic: The politics of credit and blame.. Health Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.004
Description
Funder: University of Michigan
Funder: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Funder: Engineer Research and Development Center
Abstract
COVID-19 led to significant and dynamic shifts in power relations within and between governments, teaching us how governments make health policies and how health crises affect government. We focus on centralization and decentralization within and between governments: within government, meaning the extent to which the head of government controls policy; and between governments, meaning the extent to which the central government pre-empts or controls local and regional government. Political science literature suggests that shifting patterns of centralization and decentralization can be explained by leading politicians' efforts to gain credit for popular actions and outcomes and deflect blame for unpopular ones. We test this hypothesis in two ways: by coding the Health Systems Response Monitor's data on government responses, and through case studies of the governance of COVID-19 in Austria, Czechia and France. We find that credit and blame do substantially explain the timing and direction of changes in centralization and decentralization. In the first wave, spring 2020, heads of government centralized and raised their profile in order to gain credit for decisive action, but they subsequently tried to decentralize in order to avoid blame for repeated restrictions on life or surges of infection. These findings should shape advice on governance for pandemic response.
Keywords
Coronavirus, Public Health, Health Policy, Governance, Federalism
Identifiers
35331575, PMC8913406
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.004
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/336444
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk