Cautious scrutiny: The Federal Climate Change Act case in the German Constitutional Court
Authors
Publication Date
2022-05-20Journal Title
The Modern Law Review
ISSN
0026-7961
1468-2230
Language
en
Type
Other
This Version
AO
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Theil, S. (2022). Cautious scrutiny: The Federal Climate Change Act case in the German Constitutional Court. [Other]. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12746
Abstract
Abstract: In a unanimous decision of 24 March 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court declared certain provisions of the Federal Climate Change Act (FCCA) unconstitutional. The Court upheld the greenhouse gas emission targets for the period until 2030 but found the outlined review procedure for the following years lacking: it failed to adequately specify targets, thereby violating the fundamental rights of the applicants. Despite the at times exuberant reception, this case note argues that the decision stopped well short of a legal revolution. Ultimately, the Court embraces an orthodox doctrine on positive obligations that emphasises deference to the legislature on climate change policy. Nonetheless, there are some genuine, albeit subtle legal innovations: (1) extending legal standing to applicants resident outside of Germany; (2) specifying general constitutional commitments to tackling climate change through the Paris Agreement, and (3) relying on a concept of intergenerational equity in the distribution of emission reduction burdens.
Keywords
CASE NOTE, climate change, German Constitutional Court, fundamental rights, future generations
Identifiers
mlr12746
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12746
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.84757
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk