Whole-Brain Modelling Identifies Distinct but Convergent Paths to Unconsciousness in Anaesthesia and Disorders of Consciousness
View / Open Files
Authors
Luppi, Andrea
Allanson, Judith
Williams, Guy
Craig, Michael
Peattie, Alexander
Menon, David
Bor, Daniel
Stamatakis, Emmanuel Andreas
Publication Date
2022-04-20Journal Title
Communications Biology
ISSN
2399-3642
Publisher
Nature Research
Volume
5
Issue
1
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Luppi, A., Mediano, P. A., Rosas, F. E., Allanson, J., Pickard, J. D., Williams, G., Craig, M., et al. (2022). Whole-Brain Modelling Identifies Distinct but Convergent Paths to Unconsciousness in Anaesthesia and Disorders of Consciousness. Communications Biology, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03330-y
Description
Funder: Evelyn Trust
Funder: James S. McDonnell Foundation
Abstract
The human brain entertains rich spatiotemporal dynamics, which are drastically reconfigured when consciousness is lost due to anaesthesia or disorders of consciousness (DOC). Here, we sought to identify the neurobiological mechanisms that explain how transient pharmacological intervention and chronic neuroanatomical injury can lead to common reconfigurations of neural activity. We developed and systematically perturbed a neurobiologically realistic model of whole-brain haemodynamic signals. By incorporating PET data about the cortical distribution of GABA receptors, our computational model reveals a key role of spatially-specific local inhibition for reproducing the functional MRI activity observed during anaesthesia with the GABA-ergic agent propofol. Additionally, incorporating diffusion MRI data obtained from DOC patients reveals that the dynamics that characterise loss of consciousness can also emerge from randomised neuroanatomical connectivity. Our results generalise between anaesthesia and DOC datasets, demonstrating how increased inhibition and connectome perturbation represent distinct neurobiological paths towards the characteristic activity of the unconscious brain.
Keywords
Anesthesia, Brain, Consciousness, Humans, Propofol, Unconsciousness
Sponsorship
The authors would like to thank all the participants for their contribution to this study. This work was supported by grants from the UK Medical Research Council [U.1055.01.002.00001.01 to AMO and JDP]; The James S. McDonnell Foundation [to AMO and JDP]; and the Canada Excellence Research Chairs program (215063 to AMO); the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR, UK), Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR Senior Investigator Awards [to DKM], the Stephen Erskine Fellowship (Queens’ College, Cambridge, to EAS), the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR; grant RCZB/072 RG93193) (to DKM and EAS); the L’Oreal-Unesco for Women in Science Excellence Research Fellowship to LN; the British Oxygen Professorship of the Royal College of Anaesthetists [to DKM]; The Evelyn Trust, Cambridge and the EoE CLAHRC fellowship [JA]; the Gates Cambridge Trust (to AIL); the Cambridge International Trust and the Howard Sidney Sussex Studentship (to MMC); and the Vice-Chancellor Award (to PC). AMO and DKM are Fellows of the CIFAR Brain, Mind, and Consciousness Programme. PAM and DB are funded by the Wellcome Trust (grant no. 210920/Z/18/Z). FR is funded by the Ad Astra Chandaria foundation. Computing infrastructure at the Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre (WBIC-HPHI) was funded by the MRC research infrastructure award (MR/M009041/1). The research was also supported by the NIHR Brain Injury Healthcare Technology Co-operative based at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Cambridge.
Funder references
Medical Research Council (MR/M009041/1)
Wellcome Trust (210920/Z/18/Z)
Identifiers
35444252, PMC9021270
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03330-y
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337387
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk