Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the "My Personal Breast Screening" (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial.
View / Open Files
Authors
Roux, Alexandra
Cholerton, Rachel
Sicsic, Jonathan
Moumjid, Nora
French, David P
Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
Balleyguier, Corinne
Guindy, Michal
Gilbert, Fiona J
Burrion, Jean-Benoit
Castells, Xavier
Ritchie, David
Keatley, Debbie
Baron, Camille
Delaloge, Suzette
de Montgolfier, Sandrine
Publication Date
2022-05-06Journal Title
BMC Cancer
ISSN
1471-2407
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
22
Issue
1
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Roux, A., Cholerton, R., Sicsic, J., Moumjid, N., French, D. P., Giorgi Rossi, P., Balleyguier, C., et al. (2022). Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the "My Personal Breast Screening" (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial.. BMC Cancer, 22 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women's reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial. METHODS: At inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants' acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment. DISCUSSION: Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS). CLINICALTRIALS: gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu.
Keywords
Breast cancer screening, Comprehension, Inequity, Psychological impact, Risk-stratification, Satisfaction, Underserved populations, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Early Detection of Cancer, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Socioeconomic Factors
Sponsorship
European Commission Horizon 2020 (H2020) Societal Challenges (755394)
National Institute for Health Research (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
Identifiers
35524202, PMC9073478
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337845
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk