Association of shorter leucocyte telomere length with risk of frailty.
Nelson, Christopher P
Butterworth, Adam S
Thompson, John R
Curtis, Elizabeth M
Wood, Angela M
Danesh, John N
Harvey, Nicholas C
Samani, Nilesh J
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
MetadataShow full item record
Bountziouka, V., Nelson, C. P., Codd, V., Wang, Q., Musicha, C., Allara, E., Kaptoge, S., et al. (2022). Association of shorter leucocyte telomere length with risk of frailty.. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12971
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome of decline that affects multiple systems and predisposes to adverse health outcomes. Although chronological age is the major risk factor, inter-individual variation in risk is not fully understood. Leucocyte telomere length (LTL), a proposed marker of biological age, has been associated with risk of many diseases. We sought to determine whether LTL is associated with risk of frailty. METHODS: We utilized cross-sectional data from 441 781 UK Biobank participants (aged 40-69 years), with complete data on frailty indicators and LTL. Frailty was defined as the presence of at least three of five indicators: weaker grip strength, slower walking pace, weight loss in the past year, lower physical activity, and exhaustion in the past 2 weeks. LTL was measured using a validated qPCR method and reported as a ratio of the telomere repeat number (T) to a single-copy gene (S) (T/S ratio). Association of LTL with frailty was evaluated using adjusted (chronological age, sex, deprivation, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index, and multimorbidity) multinomial and ordinal regression models, and results are presented as relative risk (RRR) or odds ratios (OR), respectively, alongside the 95% confidence interval (CI). Mendelian randomization (MR), using 131 genetic variants associated with LTL, was used to assess if the association of LTL with frailty was causal. RESULTS: Frail participants (4.6%) were older (median age difference (95% CI): 3 (2.5; 3.5) years, P = 2.73 × 10-33 ), more likely to be female (61%, P = 1.97 × 10-129 ), and had shorter LTL (-0.13SD vs. 0.03SD, P = 5.43 × 10-111 ) than non-frail. In adjusted analyses, both age and LTL were associated with frailty (RRR = 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02; 1.04) per year of older chronological age, P = 3.99 × 10-12 ; 1.10 (1.08; 1.11) per SD shorter LTL, P = 1.46 × 10-30 ). Within each age group (40-49, 50-59, 60-69 years), the prevalence of frailty was about 33% higher in participants with shorter (-2SD) versus longer telomeres (+2SD). MR analysis showed an association of LTL with frailty that was directionally consistent with the observational association, but not statistically significant (MR-Median: OR (95% CI): 1.08 (0.98; 1.19) per SD shorter LTL, P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-individual variation in LTL is associated with the risk of frailty independently of chronological age and other risk factors. Our findings provide evidence for an additional biological determinant of frailty.
Biological age, Frailty, Leucocyte telomere length, UK biobank, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Frailty, Humans, Leukocytes, Male, Risk Factors, Telomere
This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 6077. Generation of the LTL measurements was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and British Heart Foundation (BHF) through MRC grant MR/M012816/1.
Medical Research Council (MR/L003120/1)
Medical Research Council (MR/M012816/1)
National Institute for Health Research (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
British Heart Foundation (None)
British Heart Foundation (RG/18/13/33946)
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12971
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337933
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: firstname.lastname@example.org