Repository logo
 

Robots as Mental Well-being Coaches: Design and Ethical Recommendations

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Change log

Abstract

The last decade has shown a growing interest in robots as well-being coaches. However, insightful guidelines for the design of robots as coaches to promote mental well-being have not yet been proposed. This article details design and ethical recommendations based on a qualitative analysis drawing on a grounded theory approach, which was conducted with a three-step iterative design process which included user-centered design studies involving robotic well-being coaches, namely: (1) a user-centred design study conducted with 11 participants consisting of both prospective users who had participated in a Brief Solution-Focused Practice study with a human coach, as well as coaches of different disciplines, (2) semi-structured individual interview data gathered from 20 participants attending a Positive Psychology intervention study with the robotic well-being coach Pepper, and (3) a user-centred design study conducted with 3 participants of the Positive Psychology study as well as 2 relevant well-being coaches. After conducting a thematic analysis and a qualitative analysis, we collated the data gathered into convergent and divergent themes, and we distilled from those results a set of design guidelines and ethical considerations. Our findings can inform researchers and roboticists on the key aspects to take into account when designing robotic mental well-being coaches.

Description

Journal Title

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2573-9522
2573-9522

Volume Title

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
EPSRC (2505818)
EPSRC (EP/T517847/1)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R030782/1)
M. Axelsson is funded by the Osk. Huttunen foundation and the EPSRC under grant EP/T517847/1. M. Spitale and H. Gunes have been supported by the EPSRC/UKRI under grant ref. EP/R030782/1 (ARoEQ).