Repository logo
 

Griefbots, Deadbots, Postmortem Avatars: On Responsible Applications of Generative AI in the Digital Afterlife Industry

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Abstract

To analyze potential negative consequences of adopting generative AI solutions in the digital afterlife industry (DAI), in this paper we present three speculative design scenarios for AI-enabled simulation of the deceased. We highlight the perspectives of the data donor, data recipient, and service interactant – terms we employ to denote those whose data is used to create ‘deadbots,’ those in possession of the donor’s data after their death, and those who are meant to interact with the end product. We draw on the scenarios to map out several key ethical concerns posed by ‘re-creation services’ and to put forward recommendations on the ethical development of AI systems in this specific area of application. The recommendations, targeted at providers of AI-enabled re-creation services, include suggestions for developing sensitive procedures for retiring deadbots, ensuring meaningful transparency, restricting access to such services to adult users only, and adhering to the principle of mutual consent of both data donors and service interactants. While we suggest practical solutions to the socio-ethical challenges posed by the emergence of re-creation services, we also emphasize the importance of ongoing interdisciplinary research at the intersection of the ethics of AI and the ethics of the DAI.

Description

Acknowledgements: We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers whose careful engagement with our work helped us improve this piece. We are also thankful to Stephen Cave who made this work possible.

Journal Title

Philosophy & Technology

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2210-5433
2210-5441

Volume Title

37

Publisher

Springer Nature

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
Leverhulme Trust (RC-2015-067)
Stiftung Mercator (200446)
Our work was funded by the Leverhulme Trust grant no. RC-2015-067 and the Stiftung Mercator GmbH grant no. 200446.