Repository logo
 

Atomoxetine Reduces Decisional Impulsivity in Human Cocaine Addiction.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impulsivity is a well-known determinant of maladaptive behavior in cocaine use disorder (CUD), but there are currently no effective strategies for managing excessive impulsivity. Growing evidence from preclinical and clinical studies suggests that atomoxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, is effective in improving impulse control in both healthy individuals and individuals with neuropsychiatric conditions. METHODS: We investigated the effects of atomoxetine on decisional impulsivity in patients with CUD. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 28 patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe CUD and 28 matched healthy control participants completed the Cambridge Gambling Task in 2 separate sessions, where they received either placebo or a single dose of 40 mg atomoxetine at each session. Computational modeling was used to break down decision making into 3 separable components: value, probability, and decisional impulsivity. RESULTS: Our analyses revealed that patients with CUD were impaired in all components of decision making. Atomoxetine selectively reduced decisional impulsivity in patients with CUD by reducing their risk-seeking tendencies while enhancing their ability to tolerate delays. By contrast, atomoxetine did not affect impulsivity in control participants, but increased their sensitivity to prospective losses. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis of noradrenergic dysfunction in patients with CUD and provide novel translational evidence for the efficacy of atomoxetine in remediating decisional impulsivity in CUD.

Description

Journal Title

Biol Psychiatry

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0006-3223
1873-2402

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (MR/J012084/1)
Medical Research Council (MR/W014386/1)
This work was funded by a Medical Research Council (MRC) grant (MR/J012084/1) and conducted within the Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute at the University of Cambridge. It was also supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312) and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the MRC, NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The NIHR and the MRC had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and the interpretation of data. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.