Repository logo
 

The folk concept of art

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Abstract

What is the folk concept of art? Does it track any of the major definitions of art philosophers have proposed? In two preregistered experiments (N = 888) focusing on two types of artworks (paintings and musical works), we manipulate three potential features of artworks: intentional creation, the possession of aesthetic value, and institutional recognition. This allows us to investigate whether the folk concept of art fits an essentialist definition drawing on one or more of the manipulated factors or whether it might be a disjunctive or cluster concept. The results suggest that none of the three manipulated properties alone suffices for an object to be considered art. The folk concept of art might thus well be a cluster concept instead of an essentialist concept.

Description

Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Sylvy Anscombe, Levin Güver, Shen-yi Liao, Stephen Davies, and Richard Richards as well as several anonymous reviewers for helpful feedback on this paper. We do not want to imply that they agree with our views.


Funder: University of Graz

Journal Title

Synthese

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0039-7857
1573-0964

Volume Title

205

Publisher

Springer Nature

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/