A Neolithic expansion, but strong genetic structure, in the independent history of New Guinea.
Oppenheimer, Stephen J
Mentzer, Alexander J
Alpers, Michael P
Sandhu, Manjinder S
MetadataShow full item record
Bergström, A., Oppenheimer, S. J., Mentzer, A. J., Auckland, K., Robson, K., Attenborough, R., Alpers, M. P., et al. (2017). A Neolithic expansion, but strong genetic structure, in the independent history of New Guinea.. Science, 357 (6356), 1160-1163. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan3842
New Guinea shows human occupation since ~50 thousand years ago (ka), independent adoption of plant cultivation ~10 ka, and great cultural and linguistic diversity today. We performed genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping on 381 individuals from 85 language groups in Papua New Guinea and find a sharp divide originating 10 to 20 ka between lowland and highland groups and a lack of non-New Guinean admixture in the latter. All highlanders share ancestry within the last 10 thousand years, with major population growth in the same period, suggesting population structure was reshaped following the Neolithic lifestyle transition. However, genetic differentiation between groups in Papua New Guinea is much stronger than in comparable regions in Eurasia, demonstrating that such a transition does not necessarily limit the genetic and linguistic diversity of human societies.
Ethnic Groups, Genetic Structures, Genotype, Genotyping Techniques, History, Ancient, Humans, Language, Life Style, Linguistics, Occupations, Papua New Guinea, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan3842
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/291044
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: firstname.lastname@example.org