Safeguarding human-wildlife cooperation.
Authors
Balasani, Fatima
Begg, Colleen M
Buanachique, Iahaia O
Das, Jewel
Dlamini, Gcina S
Gedi, Isa I
Hoffmann, Lilian S
Holzlehner, Tobias
Isack, Hussein A
Laltaika, Eliupendo A
Pereira, Valdomiro L
Rucunua, Seliano A
Dos Santos, Wilson F
Smith, Brian D
Tun, Tint
Publication Date
2022Journal Title
Conserv Lett
ISSN
1755-263X
Publisher
Wiley
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
van der Wal, J. E., Spottiswoode, C. N., Uomini, N. T., Cantor, M., Daura-Jorge, F. G., Afan, A. I., Attwood, M. C., et al. (2022). Safeguarding human-wildlife cooperation.. Conserv Lett https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12886
Abstract
Human-wildlife cooperation occurs when humans and free-living wild animals actively coordinate their behavior to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome. These interactions provide important benefits to both the human and wildlife communities involved, have wider impacts on the local ecosystem, and represent a unique intersection of human and animal cultures. The remaining active forms are human-honeyguide and human-dolphin cooperation, but these are at risk of joining several inactive forms (including human-wolf and human-orca cooperation). Human-wildlife cooperation faces a unique set of conservation challenges, as it requires multiple components-a motivated human and wildlife partner, a suitable environment, and compatible interspecies knowledge-which face threats from ecological and cultural changes. To safeguard human-wildlife cooperation, we recommend: (i) establishing ethically sound conservation strategies together with the participating human communities; (ii) conserving opportunities for human and wildlife participation; (iii) protecting suitable environments; (iv) facilitating cultural transmission of traditional knowledge; (v) accessibly archiving Indigenous and scientific knowledge; and (vi) conducting long-term empirical studies to better understand these interactions and identify threats. Tailored safeguarding plans are therefore necessary to protect these diverse and irreplaceable interactions. Broadly, our review highlights that efforts to conserve biological and cultural diversity should carefully consider interactions between human and animal cultures. Please see AfricanHoneyguides.com/abstract-translations for Kiswahili and Portuguese translations of the abstract.
Keywords
animal culture, biocultural conservation, biodiversity conservation, dolphins, honeyguides, human–wildlife interactions, interspecies cooperation, mutualism, orcas, wolves
Sponsorship
European Research Council
Max Planck Society
Templeton World Charity Foundation
CAPES
Funder references
European Research Council (725185)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12886
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337515
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk