Management of Severe Facial Nerve Cross Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Replacement to Change Pulse Shape and Grounding Configuration: A Case-series.


Type
Article
Change log
Authors
Eitutis, Susan T 
Carlyon, Robert P 
Tam, Yu Chuen 
Salorio-Corbetto, Marina 
Vanat, Zebunnisa 
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the combined effect of changing pulse shape and grounding configuration to manage facial nerve stimulation (FNS) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. PATIENTS: Three adult CI recipients with severe FNS were offered a replacement implant when standard stimulation strategies and programming adjustments did not resolve symptoms. Our hypothesis was that the facial nerve was less likely to be activated when using anodic pulses with "mixed-mode" intra-cochlear and extra-cochlear current return. INTERVENTION: All patients were reimplanted with an implant that uses a pseudo-monophasic anodic pulse shape, with mixed-mode grounding (stimulus mixed-mode anodic)-the Neuro Zti CI (Oticon Medical). This device also allows measurements of neural function and loudness with monopolar, symmetric biphasic pulses (stimulus MB), the clinical standard used by most CIs as a comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The combined effect of pulse shape and grounding configuration on FNS was monitored during surgery. Following CI activation, FNS symptoms and performance with the Neuro Zti implant were compared with outcomes before reimplantation. RESULTS: FNS could only be recorded using stimulus MB for all patients. In clinical use, all patients reported reduced FNS and showed an improvement in Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences recognition compared with immediately before reimplantation. Bamford-Kowal-Bench scores with a male speaker were lower compared with measurements taken before the onset of severe FNS for patients 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients where CI auditory performance was severely limited by FNS, charge-balanced pseudo-monophasic stimulation mode with a mixed-mode grounding configuration limited FNS and improved loudness percept compared with standard biphasic stimulation with monopolar grounding.

Description
Keywords
Adult, Cochlea, Cochlear Implantation, Cochlear Implants, Cochlear Nerve, Electric Stimulation, Facial Nerve, Humans, Male, Replantation
Journal Title
Otol Neurotol
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
1531-7129
1537-4505
Volume Title
43
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00005/3)
MRC (MC_UU_00030/4)
Cambridge Hearing Trust